My View

Milford Township must accept the scientifically delineated Milford Aquifer

By VITO DIBIASI
Posted 3/3/24

After the mega-warehouse application was withdrawn, negotiations between Milford Township and the Milford Water Authority (MWA) began in January with a follow-up meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. on March …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in
My View

Milford Township must accept the scientifically delineated Milford Aquifer

Posted

After the mega-warehouse application was withdrawn, negotiations between Milford Township and the Milford Water Authority (MWA) began in January with a follow-up meeting scheduled for 7 p.m. on March 14 in the township hall. 

The language used by planning commissioner Kevin Stroyan and the way he is leading this discussion are encouraging. 

This is a positive step on the road to protecting the Milford Aquifer. Work on strengthening their ordinances concerning mega-warehouses is also very promising.

However, I am concerned about Milford Township supervisor Rachel Hendrick's comments at the January meeting, such as: 

1) "How deep is too deep to dig in the aquifer?" 

2) "We need studies to determine just what could be placed on that site?" and

3) "Developers would love this kind of information." 

Many still believe substantial development is appropriate on top of the delineated aquifer zone. Wanting more studies suggests they do not believe in the science that Ph.D. hydrologist Todd Giddings used in formulating the MWA Source Water Protection Plan (SWPP) that delineated that zone. 

It is deeply troubling that some still think the science behind the MWA SWPP is inconclusive, calling it a teaching document only. Likewise, they call for a "balanced approach"—code words for major development. 

If they did believe in this taxpayer-paid-for study, Milford Township would have incorporated the delineated aquifer zone in the mapping and body of the 2023 water protection ordinance. Conversely, this zone is front and center in the Dingman Township water protection ordinance. 

What standing do these public servants have to question the authenticity of Giddings' work and the rigorous scientific guidelines—set up by the EPA and PA DEP Wellhead Protection Program—through which the SWPPs were administered? 

For these negotiations to continue—on a good-faith basis—Milford Township must accept the science behind the MWA SWPP that says "the second most dangerous threat to the springs (after tanker truck spills) is large commercial development at the I84/Rt.6 Interchange." 

Like Dingman Township, almost every other municipal water protection ordinance across the Commonwealth of PA is built around these Wellhead Protection Program findings. For continuity of governance, Milford Township must do the same.

There is ample historical and scientific evidence proving the connection between the delineated aquifer zone and the Milford Springs, from 1) the MWA SWPP, 2) multiple conclusive scientific chemical tracer tests, 3) the mining operation on Schocopee Road that was terminated because it was damaging the Springs, and 4) PennDOT paying the Town of Milford a substantial sum because it damaged the Springs during the construction of I-84. 

Further corroborating evidence comes from 5) the PA DNRC study by Princeton Hydro, called the “Sawkill Creek & Vandermark Creek Watershed Conservation Plan,” 6) a letter from USGS research geologist Earl Verbeek, 7) testimony from DRN biologist Faith Zerbe, 8) a letter from Delaware Riverkeeper Maya K. van Rossum, plus 9) guidance from the PA Municipal Planning Code, 10) model water protection ordinances provided by Charley Schmehl from the Urban Research & Development Corporation in Bethlehem, PA; and 11) a model ordinance from sustainability advocates PennFuture. 

Like “water is wet,” the taxpayers/ratepayers do not have to re-prove facts that have already been established from extensive credible sources. At the March 14 meeting, if certain Milford Township officials apparently continue not  to believe in the authenticity of this evidence, then the comprehensiveness and legitimacy of these discussions can be called into question. 

Why should the MWA delegate resources to further studies, just because of intransigence? The MWA is already strapped for funds due to having to fight the mega-warehouse. To close their funding gap, they must raise their rates by 15 percent. 

The ratepayers of the MWA and taxpayers of Pike County should not pay a dime more just because some cannot accept rigorous science and the reality of the situation at hand. 

Vito DiBiasi is a member of Friends of the Milford Aquifer. He lives in Dingman Township, PA. 

Milford Township, Milford Springs, aquifer, Milford Water Authority

Comments

No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here